Wow, the law is really out to get Paul Reubens. I liked the Rob Lowe comparison, too.

Back to the topic, though. Interestingly, I think D.O. is trying to use the 'slippery slope' argument that a panty shot leads to child porn. (I disagree, of course.) It is the same sort of argument I see being used against gay marriage: if we allow gay marriage today, what awful things will be condoned tomorrow?

There's a lot more I could say on the subject, but you and I are on the same page. :]