using non-sexual reference points, they are more like the talk radio guy who recommended to aim for the head of a federal law officer, a spatter movie or that guy in Kentucky who hanged Barack Obama in effigy during the election campaign
I think you're framing it more from a creator-and-consumer standpoint. Like I said, seeing these pictures will not encourage anyone TO become a pedophile. These pictures are offered as a tool people who are already pedophiles (the consumers). They're not meant for masturbatory material. They're meant for pedophiles to show them to kids and say, "You see what Lisa is doing here? You can do this, too!"
And yeah, sex trumps violence. More children are physically abused than sexually.
Another thing that annoyed me about D'Orazio was that in her final post to that thread she once again had to swipe out against godless moral relativism, as if some godfearing folks (e.g. certain traditional societies in the Muslim middle east, but also some extreme strains of American Mormonism) have no problems with forcing girls barely into puberty into marriage and sex.
If it makes you feel better, I've seen anti-Hebrew Bible ("Old Testament") stuff on there. Although to be totally honest, I don't remember if it was her or a commentator.
There are assholes who want to control women and younger boys of every stripe.
And I agree with your Romeo and Juliet comparison. This scorched Earth thing she possibly wants would never work. Even in porn it won't worked. The most mainstream literary porn of our era, Anne Rice's "Sleeping Beauty" series, has a 15-year old heroine (or 115 ... depends on your perspective). I find the work objectionable (although I hate it because it's kind of racist), but it does show how ubiquitous teenagers in porn are ... and no actual teenagers were harmed, so ... [shrugs].
no subject
I think you're framing it more from a creator-and-consumer standpoint. Like I said, seeing these pictures will not encourage anyone TO become a pedophile. These pictures are offered as a tool people who are already pedophiles (the consumers). They're not meant for masturbatory material. They're meant for pedophiles to show them to kids and say, "You see what Lisa is doing here? You can do this, too!"
And yeah, sex trumps violence. More children are physically abused than sexually.
Another thing that annoyed me about D'Orazio was that in her final post to that thread she once again had to swipe out against godless moral relativism, as if some godfearing folks (e.g. certain traditional societies in the Muslim middle east, but also some extreme strains of American Mormonism) have no problems with forcing girls barely into puberty into marriage and sex.
If it makes you feel better, I've seen anti-Hebrew Bible ("Old Testament") stuff on there. Although to be totally honest, I don't remember if it was her or a commentator.
There are assholes who want to control women and younger boys of every stripe.
And I agree with your Romeo and Juliet comparison. This scorched Earth thing she possibly wants would never work. Even in porn it won't worked. The most mainstream literary porn of our era, Anne Rice's "Sleeping Beauty" series, has a 15-year old heroine (or 115 ... depends on your perspective). I find the work objectionable (although I hate it because it's kind of racist), but it does show how ubiquitous teenagers in porn are ... and no actual teenagers were harmed, so ... [shrugs].