Date: 2009-04-09 04:03 am (UTC)
Austen is so very not Chick Lit. Nor are the Brontes, though they get saddled with that label as well. As tempting as it is, it's not a good idea to label backwards, you know? Austen wasn't writing in the post-tv era of literary decay (or decadence, I'm torn) - she was a pioneer!

I don't expect fanfic writers to give me the same experience as the graphic novel, necessarily. I mean, some of this stuff CAN just be fun/porn.

Oh, for sure! It's just that Watchmen has a lot of in-built squick that's treated by the fans with a lighter hand than I would like. I can't, for example, reduce Eddie/Sally to *fun*. Whereas when it comes to Dan/Laurie, I'm able to handwave more, and imagine them having a happily ever after, or good superheroing times during the Crimebusters era. It's not in line with canon, but. *shrug*
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
.

Profile

quietprofanity: (Default)
quietprofanity

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags