Date: 2009-03-03 12:25 pm (UTC)
RE: "internet feminists" I probably should have just said "feminists on the Internet." I was just saying that as a catchall term because I wasn't sure if you were referring to the feminist blogopshere, since you mentioned Pandagon, or the comics feminist blogosphere, since you posted in a comics forum, or some combination of the two.

Newsarama's blog seems to be borked now, so I can't provide specific examples, but I remember there being a lot more "I feel" than "fans feel" in the piece. You also did say that feminists have an objection to girly things, which you liked. And I do feel that, despite your intentions, you did set up an us vs. them mentality especially re: femininity.

I don't mean to say that you should have said nothing, or not tried to clarify your position. My LJ is open. If I didn't want comments I would have f-locked it or disabled them or closed them. Plus, I referred to you, so you do have every right to respond. I suppose I'm just defending how I responded based on what I read in the original piece, not your new comments (and both STILL seem to not really be talking about the same thing to me). And, well, saying I also stand by my own piece.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
.

Profile

quietprofanity: (Default)
quietprofanity

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags